Improving the intensity and efficiency of compressed echo in rare-earth-ion-doped crystal
Ma Xiu-Rong1, 2, Liang Yu-Qing1, †, , Wang Song1, Zhang Shuang-Gen1, 2, Shan Yun-Long1
Department of Computer and Communication Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China
Engineering Research Center of Communication Devices and Technology, Ministry of Education; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Film Electronic and Communication Devices, Tianjin 300384, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: airforce094@sina.com

Project supported by Special Funds for Scientific and Technological Innovation Projects in Tianjin, China (Grant No. 10FDZDGX00400) and the Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology, China (Grant No. 15JCQNJC01100).

Abstract
Abstract

We investigate the intensity and efficiency of a compressed echo, which is important in arbitrary waveform generation (AWG). A new model of compressed echo is proposed based on the optical Bloch equations, which exposes much more detailed parameters than the conventional model, such as the time delay of the chirp lasers, the nature of the rare-earth-ion-doped crystal, etc. According to the novel model of compressed echo, we find that reducing the time delay of the chirp lasers and scanning the lasers around the center frequency of the inhomogeneously broadened spectrum, while utilizing a crystal with larger coherence time and excitation lifetime can improve the compressed echo’s intensity and efficiency. The theoretical analysis is validated by numerical simulations.

1. Introduction

The three-pulse photon echo (3PE) is a well-known technique which is applied to arbitrary waveform generation (AWG) and stores intense light pulses by a rare-earth-ion-doped crystal (REIC).[14] Compared to the traditional waveform generation methods, this AWG technology enjoys unrivaled capabilities in terms of processing bandwidth and time-to-bandwidth product (TBP). According to the 3PE mechanism, the compressed echo sequences are generated by REIC and can be controlled to change their shapes by adjusting the chirp lasers, thus forming AWG. This technique can generate ∼GHz/s bit rate codes with fantastic ∼105 TBP, such as an ASC-II code,[5] a periodic Barker code,[6,7] and a pulse-position-modulation code.[8] Several successful cases of AWG based on the 3PE technology have been demonstrated. Meanwhile research for the improvements of 3PE’s intensity and efficiency is continuing.

In most previous papers, the stimulated 3PE response is extensively written as the convolution product of the three input pulses’ driving fields (Eq. (2) of Ref. [3]). The intensity and phase of each input pulse can be controlled to change the echoes’ shape. This expression is simple but it ignores the relationship between the delay time of the pulses and the relaxation time which may influence the 3PE’s performance. In Ref. [9], Sangouard et al. proposed a model of photon echo based on Ref. [10]. They calculated the macroscopic polarization of the 3PE to obtain its intensity and efficiency. However, this model does not provide clear information about the signal field’s change and the relaxation time limitation which is caused by the coherent transient effect (Eq. (8) of Ref. [9]) as well. In order to make the precise control of the input pulses for improving the intensity and efficiency of 3PE, it is essential to rewrite the expression of the 3PE response in other ways.

In this paper, we consider the REIC as a thin medium and present a theoretical model for compressed echo generation in a two-level system by using the optical Bloch equations. The compressed echo can be regarded as the aggregation of numerous single photon echoes which occur from fs1 to fs1 + B.[2,4] Therefore, we first deduce the expression of a single photon echo and verify that the larger time delay of the input pulses will decrease the echo’s intensity. Furthermore, the efficiency of the photon echo is a sine-like function with the increase of the rephasing pulse’s area and optical thickness. Then, we establish the relationship between the single photon echo and the compressed echo. Compared with the conventional model of compressed echo, the novel model exposes much more detailed parameters which can be controlled in practice. According to the novel model of compressed echo, reducing the time delay of the chirp lasers and the scanning lasers around the center frequency of the inhomogeneously broadened spectrum while utilizing the crystal with larger coherence time and excitation lifetime can improve the intensity and efficiency of the compressed echo, which makes the 3PE technology more suitable for AWG.[58] Finally, the theoretical analysis is validated by numerical simulations.

2. Basic model

This section consists of two parts. We will start from the model of 3PE based on Bloch equations and analyze the factors which have influence on the echo’s intensity and efficiency. Then we will establish the relationship between 3PE and the compressed echo, and propose several methods to improve the compressed echo’s intensity and efficiency.

2.1. The model of 3PE based on optical Bloch equations

The coherent effect of pulses on a system of inhomogeneously broadened two-level atoms is given by Bloch’s equations, where the electric field acts as a source for the atomic dipoles.[11] The Bloch equations govern the coherent lossless interaction of light pulses and atomic dipoles, and are given as[12]

where u, v, and w are the dispersion, absorption, and population inversion components of the Bloch vectors; Δ=ωabω0 is the frequency detuning, which is the difference between the atom’s resonant frequency ωab and the laser frequency ω0; |R0| is the Rabi frequency, which is defined by , C·m is the dipole matrix element of the transition, and ħ is the Planck constant; T1 is the population lifetime; T2 is the coherence time of the crystal; and w0 is the balance value of population inversion.

The 3PE will appear at t3PE when three laser pulses with ultrashort time width are shot into the crystal successively, as shown in Fig. 1. Each laser pulse has a coherent interaction with the crystal including optical nutation process and free induction decay process.

Fig. 1. Basic mechanism of 3PE. The first pulse #1 interacts with the medium from t1 to . The next two pulses #2 and #3 are applied from t2 to and from t3 to , respectively. The echo is expected at time .

At time t1, the Bloch vectors are set as u(t1)= v(t1)= 0 and w(t1)=−1. Consider that the time width of the input pulses is far less than T1, T2, and the input pulses are strictly resonant, namely, Δ ≈ 0, thus the Bloch vectors during can be expressed as

where is the generalized Rabi frequency and Rt is defined as the area of input pulse.

The signal field in pulse #1’s optical nutation is given by

where , here Natom = 1024 m−3 is the total number of atoms, L is the thickness of the crystal,[13] K = ω0/c is the wave number, and ɛ = 8.85× 10−12 F/m is the dielectric constant, J0 (R0t) is the zeroth-order Bessel function with Rabi frequency R0, δωD is the inhomogeneous width, and k is the wave vector.

The Bloch vectors of pulse #1 during free induction decay are written as

where Δ′ = Δ + δω, and δω is the frequency shift of the atoms.

In the calculation, we note[14]

Therefore, the signal field in pulse # 1’s free induction decay can be written as

Similarly, the input pulse #2 has optical nutation and free induction decay processes as well. The Bloch vectors during can be expressed as

The signal field in pulse #2’s optical nutation during can be written as

Afterwards, pulse #2 undergoes the free induction decay and its Bloch vectors are given by

Imitating the calculation method of pulse # 1, the signal field in pulse # 2’s free induction decay can be written as

The third input pulse #3 has the same processes as the former two. During the optical nutation process, namely, , the Bloch vectors are given by

The signal field in pulse #3’s optical nutation can be expressed as

The Bloch vectors in the free induction decay process can be written as

The photon echo will appear at time during the last free induction decay process. Substitute all the above Bloch vectors into Eq. (13b) and take sin (Δ′(tt3PE)) = 0 into account in the deduction. The signal field of 3PE can be written as

When the areas of these three pulses satisfy

and , the signal field of 3PE obtains its maximum

Assume that the time width of each input pulse is 5 ns, which is much shorter than the population lifetime T1 and the coherence time T2. As shown in Fig. 2, these three input pulses shot into the crystal at 0 ns, 15 ns, and 50 ns, respectively. Then the 3PE will appear at .

According to Eq. (16), we can obtain several important factors about the intensity and efficiency of 3PE. The time delay between pulse #1 and pulse #2, and the time delay between pulse #2 and pulse #3 determine the photon echo’s intensity. The relationship between the photon echo’s intensity and the time delay can be written as

The time delay is limited by T2 and the time delay is limited by T1.

Fig. 2. Short rectangle-pulse photon echo simulation. (a) Three rectangle pulses with 5 ns timewidth shot into REIC at 0 ns, 15 ns, and 50 ns respectively. (b) The whole process of 3PE’s optical coherent transient effect.

As shown in Fig. 3, the intensity of 3PE follows a product of two exponential decays, which is in good agreement with Eq. (4.1) of Ref. [15].

Fig. 3. Relationship between the intensity of 3PE and the delay time of the input pulses. The coherence time T2 of the crystal is usually 1–100 ms and the population lifetime T1 of the crystal is usually ∼ 10 ms.

The read out efficiency of the photon echo is easily obtained as

According to Beer’s law,

Substituting Eqs. (3), (16), and (19) into Eq. (18), we have

where α is the absorption coefficient of the medium.

In Eq. (20), input pulse #1 and pulse #2 are set as π/2 pulses. The area of rephasing pulse #3 changes from 0 to π. For different optical thickness αL, we plot the efficiency as a function of the rephasing pulse #3’s area in Fig. 4. We observe that the efficiency is strongly dependent on the optical thickness. When the optical thickness is small, the efficiency is essentially weak since the signal is poorly absorbed. The efficiency is then a sine-like function with the increase of pulse #3’s area. On the other hand, with a larger optical thickness, the efficiency can be much larger than unity and obtains its maximum when the pulse #3’s area is π/2.

Fig. 4. Efficiency of 3PE as a function of rephasing pulse #3’s area for different optical thickness αL. Inset: for larger αL, the maximum efficiency is much larger than unity.
2.2. The model of compressed echo on arbitrary waveform generation

The arbitrary waveform generation based on 3PE is popularly used in optical communication and different signals’ generation. The arbitrary waveform consists of compressed echo sequences whose intensity and phase can be controlled by the chirp lasers. To achieve a compressed photon echo, three different linear chirp lasers are shot into an REIC. A spectral grating can be formed in the inhomogeneous broadened absorption profile when two temporally overlapping linear frequency chirps are overlapped within the REIC.

As shown in Fig. 5, the upper laser called the reference laser and the lower counterpart laser called the control laser interact with each other, thus producing a grating bandwidth B within τc. Assume that the start frequency of the reference laser is fs1 with linear chirp rate α1 and the start frequency of the control laser is fs2 with linear chirp rate α2, the spectral grating bandwidth B can be expressed as

where BBinhom, Binhom is the bandwidth of the SHB inhomogeneous broadening absorption spectrum.

Fig. 5. Diagram for the generation of compressed echo.

The delay time between the first two linear chirp lasers at certain frequency f can be given as

After the spectral grating is produced and delay time τs, a probe laser scans the REIC with chirp rate α3 = (α1 α2)/(α2α1). Due to the compression effect of the chirp lasers, a pulse compression echo τcp ≈ 1/B appears.

The compressed echo can be regarded as the aggregation of numerous single photon echoes which occur from fs1 to fs1 + B,[2,4] but it has no explicit expression in the previous papers. Therefore, we are interested in finding a mathematical expression describing the relationship between the single photon echo and the compressed echo.

According to Fig. 5, the chirp lasers can be treated as numerous discrete frequency rectangle pulses with different amplitudes shot into the crystal as shown in Fig. 6. The electric amplitude of each rectangle pulse must follow the envelope of the chirp signal, namely,

where j = 1,2,3, n = 1,2,…,N,Ej0 is the initial amplitude of each chirp laser, and ωsj is the start frequency of the j-th chirp laser.

Fig. 6. Diagram for generation of compressed echo. Each chirp laser is regarded as numerous discrete frequency rectangle pulses, where N is the amount of pulses and Δ ω is the frequency step.

Therefore, the model of the compressed echo can be written as

where and .

3. Simulation results

The simulation is performed to demonstrate the compressed echo which is the aggregation of numerous single photon echoes with different frequencies. All the parameters used are cited from Ref. [3]. The population lifetime T1 is set as 10 ms and the coherence time T2 = 150 μs. The inhomogeneous width δωD is set as 40 GHz and the thickness of the medium L = 2.5 mm. The grating bandwidth B is set as 1.2 GHz and the amount of discrete number N = 1.2× 109, namely, the frequency step Δω = 1 Hz. The start frequency ωs1 is set as 80 MHz and the frequency shift δω is set as 50 MHz. The durations of the three chirp lasers are 800 μs, 788.7 μs, and 12 μs, respectively. The chirp rate of each laser should follow α3 = (α1 α2)/(α2α1), namely,

The minimum time delay between the engraving process and the probe laser is set as 300 μs. The compressed echo will appear at 1.123 ms, as shown in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7. Simulation of compressed echo whose full width at half magnitude (FWHM) is 1 ns. The time width τcp of the compressed echo is obviously narrow, which approaches the theoretical value 1/B ≈ 0.83 ns. Our simulation result is quite close to the experiment result (FWHM is 0.9 ns) in Ref. [3].

Meanwhile, we can calculate the intensity and efficiency of the compressed echo in Ref. [3]. They used yttrium orthosilicate (Er3+:YSO) crystal (T2 ∼ 150 μs and T1∼ 11 ms) to produce the compressed echo. The time delay at the same frequency τD(f) is set as 11.3–12.42 μs, while the minimum time delay is set as 0.3 ms, and the maximum time delay is set as 1.1 ms. The stimulated compressed echo can maintain ∼ 67.62% intensity and ∼ 28.5% efficiency according to Eqs. (17) and (20).

Now, we propose some approaches for improving the intensity and efficiency of the compressed echo in arbitrary waveform generation based on Eqs. (17), (20), and (24).

The first method is controlling the time delay τD. Equation (17) shows that a larger time delay between pulse #1 and pulse #2 will decrease the intensity of the photon echo. The time delay τD between the reference laser and the control laser can be rewritten in a discrete form as

The time delay τD has two items in Eq. (22) which are related to the start frequencies and the chirp rate of TOLFCs.

As shown in Figs. 810, we find that decreasing the difference of TOLFCs’ start frequencies and the difference of the chirp rates, and utilizing higher chirp rate lasers will achieve higher echo’s intensity.

Another method is to reduce the time delay between the engraving process and the probe step. Equation (17) shows that a larger time delay between pulse #2 and pulse #3 will decrease the compressed echo’s intensity as well. The time delay between the engraving process and the probe step can be rewritten in a discrete form as

As mentioned in Refs. [2], [3], and [6]–[8], the chirp rate of the probe laser is much higher than that of the engraving lasers (Eq. (2) of Ref. [2]) and the transform time depends on the reaction speed of the arbitrary waveform generator and the optical phase lock loop.

Fig. 8. Relationship between difference of start frequency (fs1fs2) and compressed echo’s intensity.
Fig. 9. Relationship between difference of chirp rate (α1α2) and compressed echo’s intensity.
Fig. 10. Relationship between chirp rate α2 and compressed echo’s intensity.
Fig. 11. Relationship between and compressed echo’s intensity.

As shown in Fig. 11, the larger time delay will decrease the compressed echo’s intensity. Therefore, we should increase the reaction speed of the experimental instruments to shorten the time delay for keeping a high intensity of the compressed echo.

Increasing the optical thickness is also a useful method. According to Eq. (20), the efficiency of 3PE is related to the optical thickness. The efficiency increases with the increase of the optical thickness. The optical thickness αL is the product of absorption coefficient α and thickness L of the REIC.

It is unpractical to replace a much thicker REIC in the cryogenic equipment frequently. Thus, it is reasonable to increase the absorption coefficient α and it can be expressed as[12]

Here α0 is the resonant absorption coefficient, and G(f) is the laser frequency f which follows a Gaussian distribution. Obviously, it is efficient to scan lasers around the center frequency f0 of the inhomogeneously broadened spectrum to increase the absorption coefficient α as shown in Fig. 12.

Fig. 12. Diagram for laser scan range in inhomogeneously broadened spectrum.

The proper choice of REIC is also necessary. Different rare-earth-ion-doped crystals possess different T2 and T1. The coherence time T2 is determined by T2 = 1/(π Γh), where Γh is the homogeneous width of the medium. With the decrease of the temperature (ultralow temperature of 3–4 K), the line shape of the homogeneous broadening becomes sharper, which makes Γh narrower and enhances T2 at the same time.[16,17] The population lifetime T1 is decided by the wavelength of the excited state in the two-level system. According to Eq. (17), larger coherence time T2 and population lifetime T1 make the photon echo have a tiny attenuation of intensity but it does not mean that the larger the better. According to Eq. (28), larger T1 and T2 will decrease the absorption coefficient α, which may reduce the efficiency of 3PE.

Take the case in Ref. [3] for example; if we replace Er3+:YSO with Tm3+:YAG (T2 ∼ 20 μs and T1∼ 10 ms) and do not change other parameters, we will find that the intensity and efficiency of the compressed echo are 7.9% and 8%, respectively, which are far smaller than those with the Er3+:YSO crystal.

Larger coherence time T2 and excitation lifetime T1 may reduce the efficiency of 3PE, but they can lead to a higher intensity that offsets the increase of eαL. Therefore, the crystal with larger coherence time T2 and excitation lifetime T1 is beneficial to produce the compressed echo, which will be more suitable for the arbitrary waveform generation and optical storage based on the 3PE technology.[3,5]

4. Conclusion and perspectives

We have proposed a novel model of compressed echo. We first deduced the expression of 3PE based on the Bloch equations and verified that larger time delay of the input pulses will decrease the echo’s intensity. Furthermore, the efficiency of 3PE is a sine-like function with the increase of the rephasing pulse’s area and that of the optical thickness. Then, we gave the relationship between the single photon echo and the compressed echo. The novel model of compressed echo predicts the possibility of achieving high intensity and efficiency of the compressed echo. According to this model, we gave several suggestions for improving the compressed echo. These results and recent results of echoes in inverted media serve as a motive to further study the possibility of obtaining a highly efficient and strong echo.

Reference
1Chang TTian MBabbitt W 2004 J. Lumin. 107 138
2Renner C JReibel R RTian MChang TBabbitt W 2007 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 24 2979
3Damon VCrozatier VChaneliere TGouet JLeLorgere I 2010 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 27 524
4Crozatier VTian MBarber Z WBabbitt W 2004 IEEE J. Quantum. Electron. 40 1450
5Mitsunaga M 1992 Opt. Quantum. Electron. 24 1137
6Barber Z WTian MReibel R RBabbitt W 2002 Opt. Express 10 1145
7Ma XWang SZhang SZhang SLiang Y 2015 IEEE Commun. Lett. 19 179
8Ma XWang SLiang YShan Y 2015 Appl. Opt. 54 2891
9Sangouard NSimon CMinar J2010Phys. Rev. A812333
10Mossberg T WKachru RHartmann S RFlusberg A M 1979 Phys. Rev. 20 1976
11Azadeh MCornish S CBabbitt WTsang L 1998 Phys. Rev. 57 4662
12Meystre PSargent M III2007Elements of Quantum Optics4th Edn.New YorkSpringer Press281288281–8
13Chang TTian MBabbitt W 2004 J. Lumin. 107 129
14Gradshteyn I SRyzhik I M2007Table of Integrals, Series, and Products7th Edn.New YorkElsevier Academic Press10.1038/srep15779
15Mitsunaga MBrewer R G 1985 Phys. Rev. 32 1605
16Chen LMa X RWang W 2013 Chin. Phys. 22 064213
17Ma X RZhang S YZhang S G 2014 Chin. Phys. 23 060304